LAW ENFORCEMENT ON THE MISUSE OF SOCIAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS FOR MSMES IN CIREBON REGENCY

Abstract

Background The right to social assistance is a fundamental right intended to help meet the basic needs of the community. The government has provided social assistance in the form of a cash transfer amounting to IDR 1 million. However, in practice, this aid is frequently misused through illegal deductions by village officials, an act that constitutes unlawful conduct.

Objectives The objectives of this research are as follows: 1. To analyze the application of criminal law to the criminal act of corruption concerning the misuse of social assistance. 2. To identify the efforts undertaken by sub-district authorities and the police in addressing the criminal act of corruption related to the misuse of Direct Cash Assistance (BLT).

Methods This study employed a doctrinal research method using a normative juridical approach.

Results The findings indicate that the supervision and verification of the misuse of social assistance funds are conducted through non-litigation channels, primarily by examining the legal event and the circumstances of the incident. Consequently, administrative sanctions are imposed, as the offense is classified as an administrative fault falling under the jurisdiction of the sub-district inspectorate. The sub-district authority's role includes coordinating with the regional government, delivering public services, and empowering village communities. Non-litigation settlement refers to dispute resolution conducted through out-of-court mechanisms. Accountability for the misuse of funds is enforced by the sub-district authority through the revocation of the perpetrator's status as a BLT distribution coordinator. The individual is also mandated to return the misappropriated funds, with the option of reporting the case to law enforcement authorities, such as the police.

Conclusion The supervision of social assistance fund misuse is predominantly handled through non-litigation mechanisms, focusing on the factual and legal aspects of the incident, which results in the imposition of administrative sanctions.

Implications The practical implementation of legal accountability involves the sub-district authority revoking the coordinator's distribution rights and mandating the restitution of funds. It is recommended that the community in Cirebon Regency be more vigilant and discerning when receiving cash assistance and actively seek information regarding the official channels for social aid distribution.