Path Analysis Of Academic The University of Islam Bandung Performance Blended Learning

Main Article Content

Yani Ramdani
Nia Kurniati Syam
Erwin Harahap Hamdani

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between self-regulated learning, creative performance, and early mathematical proficiency in the academic success of college students. The methods of this study are to compare the assessments and surveys conducted before and throughout the educational process. Learning activities are executed through both in-person and online formats. In-person instruction is performed according to the university's established lecture timetable. E-learning is conducted via organized tasks and autonomous assignments. Data were collected from college students in the University of  Islam Bandung calculus course. The findings indicated that self-regulated learning and early mathematics aptitude significantly influenced student academic achievement, whereas the impact of creative performance was comparatively less pronounced. Self-regulated learning influences academic success by 38.76%, while early mathematical competence affects academic performance by 30.96%. Consequently, self-regulated learning significantly influences academic performance more than initial mathematical competence.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramdani, Y., Syam, N. K., & Hamdani, E. H. (2025). Path Analysis Of Academic The University of Islam Bandung Performance Blended Learning. Jurnal Edusci, 2(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.62885/edusci.v2i3.468
Section
Articles

References

A. Agarwal. (2021). The future of Learning is blended, Moving Horizontally: The New Dimensions of at-Scale Learning in the Time of COVID-19. (2021)159–172

Abbas, I. (2013). Investigating the students’ attitudes towards using the best practices in English listening in the blended e-learning environment at Al-Quds Open University. Palestinian Journal of Open & Distance Education, pp. 3, 35–71.

Adarkwah, M. A., & Huang, R. (2023). Technology addiction, abduction and adoption in higher education: Bird's eye view of the ICT4AD policy in Ghana 20 years on. British Journal of Educational Technology.

Alammary, A. (2019). Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review. PloS one, 14(9), e0221765.

Alfadly, A. A. (2013). The efficiency of the “Learning Management System (LMS)” in AOU, Kuwait, as a communication tool in an e‐learning system. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 157–169. DOI: 10.1108/09513541311297577

Alsalhi, N. R., Al-Qatawneh, S., Eltahir, M., & Aqel, K. (2021). Does blended learning improve undergraduate students' academic achievement in the mathematics course?: A case study in higher education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4), em1951. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10781

Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. S. (2019). The effect of blended learning on ninth-grade students' achievement in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5(9), e02424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02424

Ariyanti Ariyanti, Neni Hermita. (2020). The Effect Of Scaffolding-Based Problem-Based Learning Approaches To Improve Mathematical Modeling Ability Of Elementary School Students. Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 719-740.

Ayob, H. H., Daleure, G., Solovieva, N., Minhas, W., & White, T. (2023). The effectiveness of using blended learning teaching and learning strategy to develop students' performance at higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(3), 650-662.

Balentyne, P. & Varga, M.A. (2017). Attitudes and Achievement in a Self-Paced Blended Mathematics Course. Journal of Online Learning Research, 3(1), 55-72. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 12, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173313/.

Barış, M. F. (2015). Future of e-learning: Perspective of European Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1361a

Berry, J. W., & Chew, S. L. (2015). Improving Learning through Interventions of Student-Generated Questions and Concept Maps. The Teaching of Psychology, pp. 35, 305–312. DOI:10.1080/00986280802373841

Beyth-Marom, R., Chajut, E., Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (2003). Internet-assisted versus traditional distance learning environments: Factors affecting students’ preferences. Computers & Education, 41(1), 65–76. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00026-5

Boeker, M., & Klar, R. (2006). E-Learning in der ärztlichen Aus- und Weiterbildung: Methoden, Ergebnisse, evaluation. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 49(5), 405–411.

Bordoloi, R., Das, P., & Das, K. (2021). Perception towards online/blended learning at the time of Covid-19 pandemic: an academic analytics in the Indian context. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(1), 41-60. doi: 10.1108/AAOUJ- 09- 2020- 0079.

Caillies, S & Denhiere, G. (2002). The Effect of Prior Knowledge on Understanding From Text: Evidence from Primed Recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 14 (2), 267-286.

Chen, C. P., & Shih, J. L. (2013). A prototype of a meta-model for designing instructional pervasive games. In Sugimoto, M., & Aleven, V. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, (pp. 47-51). Kagawa, Japan: Conference Publishing Services.

Chen, C. P., Guo, J. F., & Shih, J. L. (2012). Constructing an evaluation framework for the cultural-inquiry pervasive game. In B. Chang, S. C. Tan, T. Matsui, G. Biswas, L. H. Wong, T. Hirashima, and W. Chen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 623-629). Singapore: Conference Publishing Services.

Coll, S. D., & Coll, R. K. (2017). Using blended learning and out-of-school visits: pedagogies for effective science teaching in the twenty-first century, Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(2), 185–204.

Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2015). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 27 (3), 1-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8

Emelyanova, N., & Voronina, E. (2017). Introducing a learning management system at a Russian university: Students' and teachers' perceptions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 273 – 289.

Fiona Faulkner, Ailish Hannigan, Olivia Fitzmaurice, (2014). The Role of Prior Mathematical Experience in Predicting Mathematics Performance in Higher Education, Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Articles Learning, Teaching & Technology Centre.

Gambari, A. I., Shittu, A. T., Ogunlade, O. O., & Osunlade, O. R. (2018). Effectiveness of blended learning and e-learning modes of instruction on the performance of undergraduates in Kwara State, Nigeria. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 25-36.

Gasaymeh, A study of undergraduate students’ use of information and communication technology (ICT) and the factors affecting their Use: a developing country perspective, EURASIA J. Math., Sci. Technol. Educ. 14 (5) (2018) 1731–1746 .

Guspatni. (2018). Students’ activities in, perceptions of and expectations for e-learning: A case in Indonesia. Knowledge Management & ELearning, 10(1), 97–112.

Hsu Kuan (Jonathan) Liu. (2016). Correlation Research on the Application of E-Learning to Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Ability, Motivational Beliefs, and Academic Performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2016, 12(4), 1091-1100

J. Broadbent & W.L.Poon. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, Volume 27, Pages 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007

Jebraeily, M., Pirnejad, H., Feizi, A., & Niazkhani, Z. (2020). Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-11.

John Oversby, Jude Sanders, Corrienna Abdul Talib, Ng Khar Thoe, Norizan Esa. (2019). Question Generating Supported by Blended Learning Platform: Issues of Social Justice for Environmental Education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), em1709 ISSN: 1305–8223 (online) OPEN ACCESS. DOI:10.29333/ejmste/105848

Jost, N. S., Jossen, S. L., Rothen, N., & Martarelli, C. S. (2021). The advantage of distributed practice in a blended learning setting. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3097-3113.

Kendeou, P & Broek, P. (2007). The Effect of Prior Knowledge and Text Structure on Comprehension Processes During Reading of Scientific Texts. Memory & Cognition Psychonomic Society, Inc. 35 (7), 1567-1577.

Khaled Alotaibi, Riyad Tohmaz, Omar J. Tabak. (2017). The Relationship Between Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement for a Sample of Community College Students at King Saud University. Education Journal.Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 28-37.

DOI: 10.11648/j.edu.20170601.14

Larsen, A. H., Mortensen, J. J., Blomqvist, J., Castelli, I. E., Christensen, R., Dułak, M., ... & Jacobsen, K. W. (2017). The atomic simulation environment is a Python library that works with atoms. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 29(27), 273002. DOI 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e

Lau, N. S., Lam, L., & Zhou, B. (2010). Enhancing blended courses to facilitate student achievement of learning outcomes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 6248, 205–216. Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_19

Liu Z et al. (2008). Activation of the SPS amino acid-sensing pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae correlates with the phosphorylation state of a sensor component, Ptr3. Mol Cell Biol 28(2):551–63.

Lo, C. M., Han, J., Wong, E. S., & Tang, C. C. (2021). Flexible learning with multicomponent blended learning mode for undergraduate chemistry courses in the pandemic of COVID-19. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(2), 175-188.

M.H. Rajab, A.M. Gazal, K. Alkattan, Challenges to online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic, Cureus 12 (7) (2020) .

Nakamura, Y., Yoshitomi, K., Kawazoe, M., Fukui, T., Shirai, S., Nakahara, T., ... & Taniguchi, T. (2018). Effective use of math e-learning with question specification. Distance Learning, E-Learning and Blended Learning in Mathematics Education: International Trends in Research and Development, 133–148.

Osuafor, A. & Njoku, C. (2016). Effect of Prior Knowledge of Behavioural Objectives on Mathematics Achievement of High and Low Ability Secondary School Students in Imo State, Nigeria. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 255-264.

Pham, P. T., Nguyen, M. T., Nguyen, T. H., Nguyen, M. T., Duong, T., & Ho, T. Q. (2021). Blended learning in action: Teachers and students' perception of implementing blended learning in CTU. Multicultural education, 7(4). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4728153

Popa, D., Repanovici, A., Lupu, D., Norel, M., & Coman, C. (2020). Using mixed methods to understand teaching and learning in COVID 19 times. Sustainability, 12(20), 8726.

Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students' learning experiences. Journal of online learning and teaching, 9(2), 271.

Ramdani, Y. (2013). Scientific Debate Instructional to Enhance Students Mathematical Communication, Reasoning, and Connection Ability in the Concept of Integral. In Proceeding, International Conference on Mathematical and Computer Sciences.

Ramdani, Y., Rohaeni, O, Wachidah, L. ( 2019). Competency Indicator Of Integral Calculus In Scientific Debate Strategies Based On Student Education Background. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (1157, 3).

Ramdani, Y., Mohamed, W. H. S. W., & Syam, N. K. (2021). E-Learning and Academic Performance during COVID-19: The Case of Teaching Integral Calculus. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 424-439.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Routledge.

Rifa'i, A. (2018, September). Students' perceptions of mathematics mobile blended learning using a smartphone. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1097, No. 1, p. 012153). IOP Publishing.

R. Rachmadtullah, M. Subandowo, Rasmitadila, M.A. Humaira, R.R. Aliyyah, A. Samsudin, et al., (2020), Use of blended learning with moodle: study effective-ness in elementary, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 29 (7) 3272–3277

Sabah, N. M. (2013). Students' attitudes and motivation towards e-learning. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Applied Sciences Gaza-Palestine.

Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., Martín-García, A. V., & Mena, J. (2019). Teachers' beliefs towards blended learning in higher education: a mixed-methods study. In Learning Technology for Education Challenges: 8th International Workshop, LTEC 2019, Zamora, Spain, July 15–18, 2019, Proceedings 8 (pp. 177-188). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_16

Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-171. Doi: 10.1177/00472395211047865

Stahl, G. (2021). Redesigning mathematical curriculum for blended learning. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040165

Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (Eds.) (1995). Constructivism in Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.

Sterling, S. (2016). A commentary on education and sustainable development goals. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 208–213. DOI: 10.1177/0973408216661886.

Sun, L., Tang, Y., & Zuo, W. (2020). Coronavirus pushes education online. Nature Materials, 19(6), 687-687.

Tallman, M. A., Carlson, M. P., Bressoud, D. M., & Pearson, M. (2016). A characterization of calculus I final exams in US colleges and universities. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, pp. 2, 105–133.

Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., &Schmid, R. F. (2011). What Forty Years of Research Say About the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28.

Tanriseven, I., & Dilmac, B. (2013). Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13, 29-36.

Thompson, R. A., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2004). Academic Aptitude and Prior Knowledge as Predictors of Student Achievement. in Introduction to Psychology.

Tong, D. H., Nguyen, T. T., Uyen, B. P., Ngan, L. K., Khanh, L. T., & Tinh, P. T. (2022). Realistic Mathematics Education's Effect on Students' Performance and Attitudes: A Case of Ellipse Topics Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 403-421.

Uzzaman, M. N., Jackson, T., Uddin, A., Rowa-Dewar, N., Chisti, M. J., Habib, G. M., & Pinnock, H. (2020). Continuing professional education for general practitioners on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: feasibility of a blended learning approach in Bangladesh. BMC family practice, 21(1), 1-10.

Van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2022). Examining the creativity assessment with generalizability theory: An analysis of creative problem-solving assessment tasks✰. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 100994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100994

Wilson, G & Randall, M (2012). 'The Implementation and Evaluation of A New Learning Space: A Pilot Study', Research In Learning Technology. Vol.20.

World Health Organization. (2020). Risk communication and community engagement readiness and initial response for novel coronaviruses (‎‎‎‎‎‎‎ nCoV)‎‎‎‎‎‎‎: interim guidance, 26 January 2020.

Zhang, W., & Zhu, C. (2017). Review on blended learning: Identifying the key themes and categories. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(9), 673–678.