When Risk Becomes Normal: Risk-Normalizing Behavior and Consumer Behavior Deviance in Excessive Consumption
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Excessive consumption has increasingly become embedded in everyday consumer life through digital marketplaces, social media trends, installment-based payments, flash sales, and lifestyle-oriented consumption.
Aims. Prior studies have discussed maladaptive consumption, compulsive buying, and perceived risk, but have paid limited attention to how consumers reinterpret risk until excessive consumption appears normal.
Methods. The research was conducted through a narrative literature review of studies on maladaptive consumption, compulsive buying, perceived risk, behavioral decision-making, social influence, risk normalization, and the normalization of deviance. Relevant literature was identified from peer-reviewed journal articles, theoretical works, and recent studies discussing consumer behavior, overconsumption, and digital consumption.
Result. This conceptual paper introduces Risk-Normalizing Behavior as a mechanism explaining how consumption-related risk becomes acceptable, manageable, or worth taking on. Based on the literature on these mechanisms, this paper develops a conceptual framework linking distorted risk perception, risk-normalizing behavior, and consumer behavior deviance.
Conclusion. This paper contributes to consumer behavior literature by extending perceived risk from risk evaluation toward risk normalization and by offering Risk-Normalizing Behavior as a conceptual bridge for understanding excessive consumption practices.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abramowitz, A., & Berenbaum, H. (2007). Emotional triggers and their relation to impulsive and compulsive psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1356–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.004
Adegboyega, A. A., Eze, C. E., & Sofolahan, O. (2021). Health and safety (HS) risks normalization in the construction industry: The SMEs perspective. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(5), 1466–1495. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i5.1417
Bloomberg Technoz. (2026, May 5). OJK catat utang pinjol Indonesia tembus Rp101 T per Maret 2026. Bloomberg Technoz. https://www.bloombergtechnoz.com/detail-news/108074/ojk-catat-utang-pinjol-indonesia-tembus-rp101-t-per-maret-2026 diakses tanggal 21 Mei 2026
Boland, W. A., Martin, S. L., & Mason, M. J. (2020). In search of well-being: The movement toward and away from maladaptive consumption. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 54(4), 1178–1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12333
Boyd, R. L., & Markowitz, D. M. (2026). Artificial intelligence and the psychology of human connection. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 21(2), 192–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916251404394
Calik, N., & Ersoy, N. F. (2016). Consumer risk perceptions on the purchases of shopping goods: A field study in Ankara, Turkey. International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.20472/SS.2016.5.4.002
CNN Indonesia. (2025, January 14). Ancaman di balik utang paylater warga RI yang tembus Rp30 T. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20250114183011-78-1187138/ancaman-di-balik-utang-paylater-warga-ri-yang-tembus-rp30-t diakses tanggal 21 Mei 2026
Feurer, S., & Haws, K. L. (2022). Justifiable justifications in sequential indulgent choice situations: A framework for future research based on perceived exceptionality. Journal of Business Research, 149, 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.044
Katadata. (2024, July 4). Milenial dan Gen Z mendominasi pengguna paylater di Indonesia. Databoks Katadata. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/media/statistik/66b5d6e18dff3/milenial-dan-gen-z-mendominasi-pengguna-paylater-di-indonesia diakses tanggal 21 Mei 2026
Kontan. (2026, March 8). Kredit macet multifinance naik ke 2,72% di 2026, OJK minta perusahaan perketat risiko. Kontan.co.id. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/kredit-macet-multifinance-naik-ke-272-di-2026-ojk-minta-perusahaan-perketat-risiko diakses tanggal 21 Mei 2026
Koran, L. M., Faber, R. J., Aboujaoude, E., Large, M. D., & Serpe, R. T. (2006). Estimated prevalence of compulsive buying behavior in the United States. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(10), 1806–1812. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.10.1806
Koul, S., & Jasrotia, S. S. (2025). How much is too much? Journey from compulsive buying to addiction of fashion products. Social Responsibility Journal, 21(8), 1686–1704. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2024-0759
Maraz, A., Griffiths, M. D., & Demetrovics, Z. (2016). The prevalence of compulsive buying: A meta-analysis. Addiction, 111(3), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13223
Nanda, A. P., Banerji, D., & Singh, N. (2023). Situational factors of compulsive buying and the well-being outcomes: What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Macromarketing, 43(3), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467231180091
Otterbring, T., & Folwarczny, M. (2024). Social validation, reciprocation, and sustainable orientation: Cultivating “clean” codes of conduct through social influence. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103612
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
Reimann, M., & Jain, S. P. (2021). Maladaptive consumption: Definition, theoretical framework, and research propositions. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 6(3), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/714822
Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155
Sedlar, N., Irwin, A., & Martin, D. (2023). A qualitative systematic review on the application of the normalization of deviance phenomenon within high-risk industrial settings. Journal of Safety Research, 86, 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.07.005
Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ayal, S. (2015). Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414553264
Thomas, M. L., Levine, L., Denton, L. T., & Gruben, K. (2017). Online and in-store compulsive buying among metrosexuals, and other male consumers. Journal of Applied Marketing Theory, 7(2), Article 1.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Wang, Z. (2025). The influence of AI on consumer behavior: Shaping choices and preferences in the digital marketplace. Systems and Soft Computing, 7, 200397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sasc.2025.200397