the Effect Of Competency and Professional Skepticism On Audit Quality (Empirical Study at Public Accountant Office Bandung) Audit

Main Article Content

ERPI RAHMAN
Solihin Royani
Ardhiatul Halima Tuasalamony
Billa Adzani Putri

Abstract

Abstract. The study aims to determine the effect of competency and professional skepticism on audit
quality in Public Accountant Offices (KAP) in Bandung. This study uses a quantitative research method.
The sample in this study consists of 35 respondents from 48 questionnaires distributed to auditors working
at Public Accountant Offices (KAP) in Bandung. Data analysis in this study uses multiple linear regression
models with IBM SPSS (Statistical Program for Social Science) software version 29.0. The results of this
study indicate that the competency and professional skepticism variables simultaneously have a positive
and significant effect on audit quality. Partially, the competency variable has a positive and significant
effect on audit quality, while professional skepticism does not have a significant effect on audit quality.
The Adjusted R Square value is 0.553 or 55.3%, while the remaining 44.7% is explained by other variables
aside from the independent variables in this study.

Article Details

How to Cite
RAHMAN, E., Royani, S., Tuasalamony, A. H., & Putri, B. A. (2024). the Effect Of Competency and Professional Skepticism On Audit Quality (Empirical Study at Public Accountant Office Bandung): Audit. Jurnal Ekuisci, 2(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.62885/ekuisci.v2i1.461
Section
Articles

References

Agoes, Sukrisno. (2017). Auditing: Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan oleh Kantor Akuntan

Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Alsaeedi, A. M. A., Kamyabi, Y. (2023). “The Impact Of Auditor Experience And Competence

On Audit Quality With Moderating Role Of Auditors Ethics: Evidence From Iraq”. Russian

Law Jurnal. Vol. XI, (11).

Megah

| 12

DOI 0000

https://annpublisher.org/ojs/index.php/ekuisci

Vol 2 No 1 September 2024

Aruan, D. A., Gulo, H. N., Nahor, A. K. L., Ginting, N. B., & Wahyuni, E. T. (2019). “Pengaruh

Kompetensi, Kompleksitas Tugas, Skeptisme Profesional Terhadap Kualitas Audit”. Riset

dan Jurnal Akuntansi. Vol. 3, (2), 215-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v3i2.141.

Dewi., Kadir, A. R., Indrijawati, A. (2021). “The Effect of Auditor Professional Skepticism,

Competence and Independence on Audit Quality”. Journal of Research in Business and

Management. Vol. 9, (11), 53-63.

Harahap, R. C. N. (2020). “Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Skeptisme Profesional, Independensi dan

Tekanan Waktu terhadap Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Fraud (Studi Empiris

Kantor Akuntan Publik Se-Kota Medan)”. Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (IAI). 2022. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) No. 1:

Penyajian Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: IA

Khavis, J. A., Krishnan, J., Tipton, C. (2022). “Implications of Employee Satisfaction and Work

Life Balance in Accounting Firms”. American Accounting Association. Vol. 16, (1), 16-26.

DOI: 10.2308/CIIA-2021-006

Mulyadi. (2014). Auditing. Edisi 6. Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Mutmainah, S., Budiyono, I., Lestari, S.S., Hasanah, S., & Widowati, M. (2020). “Pengaruh

Profesionalisme, Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Akuntabilitas terhadap Kualitas Audit”.

Prosiding Seminar Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Polines. Vol. 3, 182- 193.

Muzahid, M. (2019). “Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi dan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor

terhadap Kualitas Audit”. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Vol. 21, (2), 91-102. p-ISSN 1693

, e-ISSN 2549-5003.

Novita, R., Sari, D. P. P., Lestari, S.S., & Suci, R. G. (2023). “Pengaruh Kompetensi,

Independensi, Skeptisme Profesional dan Tekanan Anggaran Waktu terhadap Kualitas

Audit”. Research In Accounting Journal. Vol. 3, (1), 172-183.

Rahayu, K.S., dan Suhayati, E. (2010). Auditing: Konsep Dasar dan Pedoman Pemeriksaan

Akuntan Publik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Rahim, S., Sari, R., Wardaningsi, W & Muslim, M. (2020). “Pengaruh Integritas, Kompetensi dan

Skeptisme Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit”. Profita: Komunikasi Ilmiah Akuntansi dan

Perpajakan. Vol. 13, (2), 241-254. DOI: http://doi.org/10.22441/profita.2020.v13i2.007.

Renaldi & Mawardi, R. (2021). “Kompetensi Auditor, Independensi, Skeptisme Profesional, dan

Kualitas Audit”. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi. Vol. 14, (2), 153-168. P-ISSN: 1979-858X; E-ISSN:

-1190.

Rinaldy, S., Anwar, A., (2021). “Professional Skepticism, Auditor Competence and Moral

Reasoning on Audit Quality”. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing. Vol. 2, (3),

-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47090/povraa.v2i3.151.

Megah

| 13

DOI 0000

https://annpublisher.org/ojs/index.php/ekuisci

Vol 2 No 1 September 2024

Savira, J. A., Rahmawati., & Ramadhan, A. (2021). “Pengaruh Kompetensi Dan Skeptisme

Profesional Terhadap Kualitas Audit”. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan. Vol. 9, (1), 23-30.

ISSN 2337 – 7852 E-ISSN 2721 – 3048.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. (Vol. 4). Alfabeta.

Suhayati, E. (2021). Auditing: Teori dan Praktik Dasar Pemeriksaan Akuntan Publik. Bandung:

Rekayasa Sains

Sumartik. (2018). Buku Ajar Perilaku Organisasi. UMSIDA Press.

Tandiontong, M. (2015). Kualitas Audit dan Pengukurannya. Alfabeta

Tawakkal, U. (2019). “Pengaruh Independensi, Integritas, Target Waktu dan Skeptisisme

Profesional Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit”. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi. Vol. 2, (2), 72-81. e

ISSN : 2622-6383.

Wind, A. (2014). Forensic Accounting Untuk Pemula & Orang Awam. (Fernando_HS, Ed.). Dunia

Cerdas