Analysis Of Time Motion Study Comparison For Coconut Husk Processing With Coconut Husk Crushing Machine Assistive Tool

Main Article Content

Andri Hermawan
Muhammad Nana Trisolvena
Arif Nurudin

Abstract

Background. Entrepreneurs utilize abundant raw materials by making coconut husk, which is the main ingredient in making coconut husk brooms. However, many still use conventional methods to process it, such as pounding it until it becomes fiber.


Aim. To be carried out effectively, it is deemed necessary to have technological assistance, such as the Coconut Husk Shredding Machine.


Methods. However, to ensure that the aid has improved the effectiveness of the coconut husk shredding process, it is necessary to analyze and compare the time motion study between the two methods. By comparing the Standard Time between the two methods,


Result. We can determine the extent of the difference, allowing us to quickly estimate the amount of product produced from coconut husk shredding within a specific time frame or how long it takes to process the available amount of coconut husk.


Conclusion. The research and time motion study analysis results in an activity of shredding coconut husks using conventional methods and machines, which aligns with the hypothesis that shredding coconut husks using machines is 2.91 minutes faster than traditional methods.


Implication. This work time measurement recommendation can be used as a standard time measurement in shredding coconut husks using conventional and machine methods.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hermawan, A., Trisolvena, M. N., & Nurudin, A. (2025). Analysis Of Time Motion Study Comparison For Coconut Husk Processing With Coconut Husk Crushing Machine Assistive Tool. Jurnal Improsci, 2(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.62885/improsci.v2i4.615
Section
Articles

References

Astrand, P.O. & Rodahl, K. 1977. Textbook of Work Physiology-Physiological Bases of Exercise, 2nd edt. McGraw-Hill Book Company. USA.

Barnes, R. M. (1980). Motion and Time Study Design and Measurement of Work. Seventh Edition. John Wiley & Sons.

Corlett, E.N. & Clark, T.S. 1995. The Ergonomics of Workspaces and Machines. A Design Manual. 2nd edt. Taylor & Francis. Great Britain.

Fernando, A. A. G., Manimaran, G., & Ross, N. S. (2024). A comprehensive assessment of coconut shell biochar created Al-HMMC under VO lubrication and cooling—challenge towards sustainable manufacturing. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14(8), 9059-9075.

Freivalds, A. (2009). Niebel’s Methods, Standards, and Work Design. 12th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.

Geinady, A.M. 1996. Physical Work Capacity. Dalam: Battacharya, A. & McGlothlin, J.D. eds. Occupational Ergonomic. Marcel Dekker Inc. USA: 219-232.

Grandjean, E. 1993. Fitting the Task to the Man, 4th edt. Taylor & Francis Inc. London.

Hairy, J., 1989. Fisiologi Olahraga Jilid 1. Jakarta: Depdikbud, Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi.

Hopkins 2002. Fitness Fundamentals- Duidelines for Personal Exercise Programs. Developed by the President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports.

Kevindran, A., & Shanmugam, L. (2016). Modification of Asphalt Binder by Incorporating Coconut Shell Powder.

Khalid, A. (2024). Manufacturing of Coconut Coir Peeling Machine. International Journal of Integrated Science and Technology, 2(12), 1103-1114.

Konz, S. 1996. Physiology of Body Movement. Dalam: Battacharya, A. &

McGavin, R. L., Leggate, W., Bailleres, H., Hopewell, G., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2019). A guide to the rotary veneer processing of coconut palms.

Meyers, F. E. dan Stewart, J. R. (2002). Motion and time study for lean manufacturing (Vol. 370). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Niebel (2001). Methods, Standards, and Work Design. Tenth Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.

Olorunfemi, B. J., Olumilua, A. E., Kayode, S. E., & Arounsoro, A. A. (2022). Development of a Modified Dehusking Machine for Local Varieties of Coconut. Covenant Journal Of Engineering Technology.

Seetharaman, S. (2019). Review of Science and Technology Interventions Developed by Rural Technology Action Group, IIT Madras. Rural Technology Development and Delivery: RuTAG and Its Synergy with Other Initiatives, 69-80.

Sutalaksana, I. Z., Anggawisastra, R., Tjakraatmadja, J. H. (1979). Teknik Tata Cara Kerja, Jurusan Teknik Industri ITB, Bandung. Wignjosoebroto, S. (2000). Ergonomi, Studi Gerak dan Waktu: Teknik Analisis untuk Peningkatan Produktivitas Kerja. Edisi I Cetakan ke- 2, Penerbit Guna Widya, Surabaya.

Tatrari, G., Tewari, C., Pathak, M., Bhatt, D., Solanki, M., Shah, F. U., & Sahoo, N. G. (2023). Coconut-husk derived graphene for supercapacitor applications: comparative analysis of polymer gel and aqueous electrolytes. Materials Advances, 4(15), 3310-3322.

Tongdang, I., & Kiatkittipong, W. (2023). The Catalytic Pyrolysis Of Coconut Shell Over Ni-Doped Activated Carbon Catalyst For Aromatic-Rich Bio-Oil Production (Doctoral dissertation, Silpakorn University).

Most read articles by the same author(s)