Dive Deeper into the Nature of Corruption through an Interdisciplinary Lens
Main Article Content
Abstract
Numerous scholars have conducted interdisciplinary studies from theoretical and empirical viewpoints to tackle the complex corruption issue. Presenting opinions from other disciplines, this study provides a comprehensive and current analysis of the recent literature on corruption. More specifically, the writers clarified corruption by merging viewpoints from several fields, including criminology, psychology, and economics. Through an organized investigation of the origins and effects of corruption at the human, corporate, and societal levels, we may comprehend the elements that lead to corrupt behavior and its substantial influence.
Article Details
References
Abramovaite, Juste, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Samrat Bhattacharya, and Nick Cowen. “Classical Deterrence Theory Revisited: An Empirical Analysis of Police Force Areas in England and Wales.” European Journal of Criminology 20, no. 5 (2023): 1663–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211072415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211072415
Acemoglu, Daron, and James A Robinson. “Reversal of Fortune : Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution Author ( s ): Daron Acemoglu , Simon Johnson , James A . Robinson Published by : The MIT Press Stable URL : Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/4132478 Http://W.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, no. 4 (2008): 1231–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935025
Adri, Sandy, Syafruddin Karimi, and Indrawari Indrawari. “Pengaruh Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Terhadap Perilaku Kriminalitas (Tinjauan Literatur).” Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik 5, no. 2 (2019): 181–86. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2019.005.02.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2019.005.02.7
Ahmed, Fethi Ben Jomaa. “Corruption: A Sociological Interpretative Study with Special Reference to Selected Southeast Asian Case.” University of Malaya, 2003.
Barberis, Nicholas. “Psychology and the Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 Nicholas Barberis 1 This Draft: August 2011.” SSRN 1, no. August (2011): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1742463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1742463
Becker, Gary S. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76, no. 2 (1968): 169–217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1830482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/259394
Benson, Michael L. “Denying The Guilty Mind: Accounting For Involvement In A White-Collar Crime.” Criminology 23, no. 4 (1985): 583–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00365.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00365.x
Bloch, Harry, and Sam Hak Kan Tang. “Deep Determinants of Economic Growth: Institutions, Geography and Openness to Trade.” Progress in Development Studies 4, no. 3 (2004): 245–55. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993404ps088pr. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993404ps088pr
Cressey, Donald R. “The Theory of Differential Association: An Introduction.” Social Problems 8, no. 1 (1960): 2–6. https://doi.org/10.2307/798624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1960.8.1.03a00010
Dimant, Eugen, Tim Krieger, and Margarete Redlin. “A Crook Is a Crook... But Is He Still a Crook Abroad? On the Effect of Immigration on Destination-Country Corruption.” German Economic Review 16, no. 4 (2015): 464–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12064
Dollar, David, Raymond Fisman, and Roberta Gatti. “Are Women Really the ‘Fairer’ Sex? Corruption and Women in Government.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46, no. 4 (2001): 423–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00169-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00169-X
Eberhard Feess, Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch, Markus Schramm, Ansgar Wohlschlegel. “The Impact of Fine Size and Uncertainty on Punishment and Deterrence: Theory and Evidence from the Laboratory.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 149, no. 1 (2018): 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.021
Esarey, Justin, and Gina Chirillo. “Fairer Sex or Purity Myth? Corruption, Gender, and Institutional Context.” Politics and Gender 9, no. 4 (2013): 361–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X13000378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X13000378