Comparative Legal Analysis of The Death Penalty Provisions In Indonesia: The State Of Pancasila Law's Perspective (Case Study of Law Numbers 1 Of 1946 And Law Number 1 of 2023 Concerning The Criminal Code)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The death penalty is one tool used by law enforcement to deal with significant crimes. Its purpose is to deter criminals from committing similar crimes in the future and to make those who have not engaged them feel fearful of doing so. Following the reforms, the Republic of Indonesia's legal politics evolved into one that supports democracy. The surface issues concern how the death sentence laws are seen from the standpoint of the Pancasila legal state. This study aims to compare regulatory policies regarding the death penalty from the perspective of Pancasila's legal system. Normative juridical research is the analytical tool employed to explore this issue. The findings of this study, specifically the death penalty clauses included in Law Number 1 of 1946 and Law Number 1 of 2023 governing the Criminal Code, contain many different things that were initially the basic criminal death penalty, which were changed to special criminal penalties. There are also several relationships and comparisons between certain crimes because the principle of legality is still in effect. In the Indonesian context, the view of life is Pancasila, a joint agreement or consensus between the majority of the Indonesian nation.
Article Details
References
Adam Ilyas, Dicky Eko Prasetio, and Felix Ferdin Bakker, 'Building Morality and Law as an Integrative Mechanism in Society in the Perspective of Progressive Law', Pulpit of Justice, 14.2 (2021), 128–38
Amnesty International Indonesia. Amnesty International's Global Report on the Death Penalty and Executions 2021. Jakarta Amnesty International Indonesia, 2022, p. 31.
Asshiddiqie J, The Constitution of the State: The Praxis of a Dignified and Democratic State. 2015 Setara Press.
Atmasasmita, R. Moral Pancasila, Law, and Power (First). 2020 Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Bam, "The New Criminal Code Bill Avoids the Death Penalty Better", Legal Newsonline, November 8, 2020, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ruu-kuhp-baru-lebih-menghindari-pidana-mati-hol1104?page=1. Web 14 Feb 2023.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Several Aspects of Criminal Law Enforcement and Development Policy (Citra Aditya Bakti, 1998).
Gunawan, Y., & Kristian. The development of the concept of the state of law and the state of Pancasila law. 2015 Refika Aditama.
I Dewa Gede Atmadja. Philosophy of Law Thematic and Historical Dimensions. 2013 Malang: Setara Press.
Indonesian. The 1945 Constitution and its amendments.
Indonesian Constitutional Court. Decision No. 2-3/PUU-V/2007 dated October 23, 2007 which was read on October 30, 2007.
M. Gultom, Binsar. A Judge's Critical View in Law Enforcement in Indonesia Volume 2, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta, 2015.
Mehdi Saboori Pour, S. A. M. The DeterrentEffect of Death Penalty on the Behavior of the Potential Perpetrators of Death-Deserving Crimes in Iranian Criminal Justice System. 2020 Journal Of Critical Reviews, 7, 2784.
Mulya Todung Lubis. Death Penalty After Constitutional Court Decision . The 39th Journal of Law and Development No. 2 April-June 2009, Jakarta: FHUI Publishing House, 2009
Prakoso, A. Criminology and Criminal Law (Definition, Flow, Theory and Development) 2017 (pp. 1–2). pp. 1–2.
Purba, N., Tanjung, A. M., Sulistyawati, S., Pramono, R., & Purwanto, A. Death Penalty and Human Rights in Indonesia. 2020 International Journal, 9, 1357.
Rukman Andika Auliah, 'The Death Penalty Reviewed from a Sociological Perspective and Human Rights Enforcement', Journal of Sociology Education Equilibrium, IV, 2016.
Slamet Tri Wahyudi, 'Problems of the Application of the Death Penalty in the Context of Law Enforcement in Indonesia', Journal of Law and Justice, 1.2, 2012
Suryana, E, K. Pancasila and National Identity Resilience, 2015 Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Tri Slamet Wahyudi, "Problems of the Application of the Death Penalty in the Context of Law Enforcement in Indonesia", 2012, p. 208, Journal of Law and Justice, Volume 1, Number 2.