Cancellation of Homologated Peace by Creditors (Analysis of the Legal Standing of Cooperative Members as PKPU Applicants in the Commercial Court Decision at the Semarang District Court Number 1/Pdt.Sus-Pembatalan Perdamaian/2023/ PN Niaga Smg jo. Number 43/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Smg)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. The Sharia Savings and Loan Cooperative and Financing (KSPPS) as the Debtor in the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations case Number 43/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Smg (PKPU 43/2020/Smg), submitted a peace proposal to the Creditors and was eventually approved by the Creditors, making it binding and must be fulfilled by the Debtor.
Aim. This research examines the legal considerations of judges regarding the rights of KSPPS members as Creditors who file for annulment of the Homologation Agreement agreed upon by the Creditors and Debtor.
Methods.This paper is the result of research using a normative juridical approach. Legal research based on the study of the Cancellation Decision of PKPU 1/2023/Smg, linked to legal norms and regulations. This research is descriptive-analytical in nature. Data analysis was conducted using qualitative analysis methods, related to the rejection of the annulment of the Peace Agreement/Homologation by the Assembly, with the consideration that the meeting of members could bankrupt the Cooperative.
Result. KSPPS is considered to have failed to fulfill the contents of the Homologation, thus the Creditors have the right to file for the annulment of the Homologation through the commercial court proceedings mechanism and registered in the case register Number 1/Pdt.Sus-Pembatalan Perdamaian/2023/PN Niaga Smg ("PKPU No. 1/2023/Smg"). However, the annulment of the Homologation was rejected by the first-instance court and cassation because the Cooperative can only be declared bankrupt if approved by the Members' Meeting.
Conclusion. The Supreme Court must be able to bridge the differences in interpretation by issuing guidelines for interpreting the provisions of Article 291 paragraph (2) of the K-PKPU Law, thereby achieving legal certainty.
Implication. This research is useful as an example of overcoming the case of reconciliation of cooperative creditors and canceling agreements.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Article No. 25 of 1992 on Cooperatives. (n.d.).
Article No. 34 of 2007 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. (n.d.).
Commercial Court Decision at the Semarang District Court number 1/Pdt.Sus-Pembatalan Perdamaian/2023/PN Niaga Smg, dated June 13, 2023. (n.d.).
Dr. Ir. Burhan Barid, M. T. (2024, June 10). Chairperson of the KSPPS Management. Yogyakarta.
Ginting, E. R. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan: Rapat-rapat Kreditor (Vol. II). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ginting, E. R. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan: Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit (Vol. III). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hutagalung, S. M. (2019). Praktik Peradilan Perdata, Kepailitan, dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Karanganyar Religious Court Decision number 729/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Kra, dated December 3, 2024. (n.d.).
Karanganyar Religious Court Decision number 824/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Kra, dated November 15, 2023. (n.d.).
Semarang Religious High Court Decision number 26/Pdt.G/2024/PT Smg, dated February 12, 2024. (n.d.).
Semarang Religious High Court Decision number 40/Pdt.G/2025/PTA Smg, dated February 5, 2025. (n.d.).
Simanjuntak, R. (2023). Undang-undang Kepailitan dan PKPU Indonesia: Teori dan Praktik (1st ed.). Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2009). Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan. Jakarta: PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Subhan, M. H. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik Peradilan (1st ed.). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Suci, I. D. (2020). Hukum Kepailitan: Karakteristik Renvoi Prosedur dalam Perkara Kepailitan (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: LaksBang Justitia.
Suci, I. D. (2021). Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip Kepastian Hukum Penetapan Hakim Pengawas terhadap DPT-PKPU pada Pencocokan Piutang oleh Kurator dalam Kepailitan (1st ed.). Yogyakarta.
The Supreme Court Cassation Decision number 910 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023/Pailit, dated August 24, 2023. (n.d.).