The Role of The Prosecutor’s Office in Asset Seizure

Main Article Content

Adi Sulistiyono
Isharyanto Isharyanto
Fadhil Purnama Adi

Abstract

The seizure of assets resulting from criminal acts will be easier for law enforcement officials to carry out if the Draft Law on Asset Forfeiture is passed. Assets that are seized are not only related to corruption crimes but also general crimes that carry a prison sentence of 4 years or more. The amount of assets seized is also at least IDR 100 million. This paper will explore the urgency of the Asset Forfeiture Bill in terms of the politics of legislation and then be limited to discussions on the direction of law enforcement that is considered responsive, especially regarding institutions that have authority in implementing the law. This paper is a type of doctrinal research that the data collection technique used is a literature technique, while the analysis in this study is after all legal materials are collected both from primary legal materials and secondary legal materials then clarified. Without strong watchdog institutions, impunity becomes the very foundation upon which systems of corruption are built. And if impunity is not demolished, all efforts to bring an end to corruption are in vain. Integrity, transparency, and the fight against corruption have to be part of the culture.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Sulistiyono, A., Isharyanto, I., & Purnama Adi , F. (2023). The Role of The Prosecutor’s Office in Asset Seizure. Jurnal Legisci, 1(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.62885/legisci.v1i2.86
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Isharyanto Isharyanto, Sebelas Maret University

 

 

Fadhil Purnama Adi

 

 

References

Arrijal Rachman. (2023, April 27). Update Mahfud: Draf RUU Perampasan Aset Sudah di Meja Jokowi. Https://Www.Cnbcindonesia.Com/News/20230427135017-4-432740/UpdateMahfud-Draf-Ruu-Perampasan-Aset-Sudah-Di-Meja-Jokowi.

Badan Legislasi. (2023, April 2). PR Serius Tunggu Draf Naskah RUU Perampasan Aset dari Pemerintah.Https://Www.Dpr.Go.Id/Berita/Detail/Id/43930/t/DPR+Serius+Tunggu+Draf+Naskah+RUU+Perampasan+Aset+dari+Pemerintah.

Hans Krause Hansen. (2011). Managing Corruption Risks. Review of International Political Economy, 18(2), 251–275.

Jean-Pierre Brun dkk. (2021). Asset Recovery Handbook: A Guide for Practitioners. The World Bank.

Katherine E. Ryder. (2011). Making hay while the sun shines: Experiences with the Zambian Task Force on corruption. U4 Practice Insight, Bergen,

Lalola Easter, Kurnia Ramadhana, & Diky Anandya. (2022). Urgensi Pengaturan Sita Jaminan dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Michael Levi, Maria Dakolias, & Theodore S. Greenberg. (2007). The Many Faces of Corruption:Tracking Vulnerabilities at the Sector Level, ed. oleh J. Edgardo Campos dan Sanjay Pradhan. World Bank.

Molejatno. (2000). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana . Liberty.

Sal Vasta. (2013). Asset Recovery – a Practical Example from Queensland, Australia. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 39(1), 33–36.

Tajuk Rencana Kompas. (2023, April 12). Mewujudkan RUU Perampasan Aset.Https://Www.Kompas.Id/Baca/Opini/2023/04/11/Mewujudkan-Ruu-Perampasan-Aset.

Tim Detik Finance. (2023, March 13). Deretan Pejabat Negara Suka Pamer Harta Berujung Nelangsa,. Deretan Pejabat Negara Suka Pamer Harta Berujung Nelangsa.

Willie Hofmeyr. (2013, March). The Effective Use of Asset Recovery. Commonwealth Law Bulletin 39, No. 1. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/03050718.2012.751202.

Yunus Husein. (2007). Bunga Rampai Anti Pencucian Uang. Books Terrace and Library.

Zico Junius Fernando, Pijiyono, & Nur Rochaeti. (2022). Perampasan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(1), 83–93.