THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RUPBASAN ON STATE CONFISCATED PROPERTY CASE STUDY OF CLASS 1 CIREBON RUPBASAN
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Abstract
Background. Indonesia guarantees the ownership of goods in the 1945 constitution, as stated in Article 28 H paragraph (4), which states that "Everyone has personal property rights and such property rights may not be arbitrarily taken over by anyone, " but only if the goods are obtained illegally.
Therefore, the state has the right to carry out coercive efforts against citizens if they are strongly suspected of committing unlawful acts. Law enforcement officials can confiscate goods suspected to be the result of criminal acts for the purpose of proof at the level of investigation, prosecution, and trial, including goods confiscated as an implementation of a judge's decision that has permanent legal force.
Aims.Based on Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) article 44 paragraph (1) State confiscated objects are stored in the State Confiscated Objects Storage House. However, in the storage of state confiscated goods, Rupbasan has a number of challenges, namely how effective is the authority to regulate the storage of state confiscated goods by Rupbasan? and what factors affect the performance of Rupbasan?
Methods. This writing uses doctrinal-empirical methods presented with analytical descriptiveness. The data collection carried out in this writing is a literature study and interviews.
Result. The paper will examine the effectiveness of Rupbasan's role in storing confiscated goods, the challenges faced by Rupbasan in regulating the authority of other agencies/institutions to store state confiscated goods that can shift the role of Rupbasan itself, and factors that hinder Rupbasan's performance in storing state confiscated goods.
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Referensi
Ali, A. (2015). Unveiling the Legal Veil. Jakarta: Prenadmedia Group.
Arikunto, S. (1998). Practice Approach Research Procedure.
ASIS, A. S. (2014). Criminal Procedure Law: An Introduction. Jakarta.
Atmasasmita, R. (2009). The Criminal Justice System: Existentialism and Abolitionism Perspectives. Bandung: Bina Cipta.
Basmanizar. (1997). Rescue and security of state confiscated objects and state spoils in Rupbasan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Hamzah, A. (2001). Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Henry Donald Lbn, T. (2020). Storage of confiscated goods at Rupbasan. The Effectiveness of the Law on the Storage of Confiscated Goods in the Rupbasan.
Kusumawardhani, S. (2022). Management of Confiscated Goods and State Confiscated. Management of Confiscated Objects and State Spoils in Law Enforcement of the City of Depok.
Lumban, P. J. (2024). The role of the prosecutor's office in the management of evidence. The role of the prosecutor's office in the management of evidence and confiscated goods.
Manuaba, I. B. (2024). Storage and Management of State Confiscated Objects. Effectiveness of Storage and Management of State Confiscated Objects .
Poerwadarminta, W. ( 2008). Great Dictionary of the Indonesian Language. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Remmelink, J. (2003). Criminal law: Commentary on the most important articles of the Dutch Criminal Code and its Amendments in the Indonesian Criminal Code. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Rizal, S. M. (n.d.). Mechanism of Storage of Narcotics Confiscated Objects. Mechanism for storing and destroying narcotics confiscated objects.
Sanusi, A. (2018). Opimalization of the governance of state confiscated property. Opimalization of the management of state confiscated property in the storage house of state confiscated property, 207.
Sugeng, D. A. (2020). Human Resource Quality Development Strategy. Strategy for the Development of Legal Human Resources Quality through Professional Certification, 178.
Wibowo, Q. R. (2022). The Role of the Storage House of confiscated property of the state. The Role of the Storage House of state confiscated goods and state confiscated goods.