Comparative Literature Study on Independent Learning Methods, Deep Learning, and Flipped Classroom in 21st Century Education

Main Article Content

Djohan Rochanda Wiradinata
Jaja Jaja
Andri Hermawan

Abstract

Background: The transformation of 21st-century education has accelerated the adoption of student-centered pedagogies that promote learner autonomy, higher-order thinking, active engagement, and technology-supported learning. Independent (Merdeka) Learning, Deep Learning, and Flipped Classroom have been widely discussed; however, previous studies have predominantly examined these approaches separately, leaving limited understanding of their complementary roles within an integrated pedagogical framework.


Aims: This study aims to systematically compare the conceptual foundations, implementation characteristics, and complementary functions of Independent Learning, Deep Learning, and Flipped Classroom and to develop an integrative framework for 21st-century education.


Methods: We conducted a qualitative Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA framework. We identified relevant literature published between 2013 and 2025 through Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, then screened it using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected studies were analyzed through thematic coding, comparative analysis, and synthesis to identify conceptual patterns, distinctive characteristics, and opportunities for pedagogical integration.


Results: The findings show that the three approaches share a student-centered orientation but operate at different, complementary levels. Independent Learning provides a philosophical and policy-oriented foundation emphasizing learner autonomy and curriculum flexibility; Deep Learning provides a cognitive orientation toward conceptual understanding, critical thinking, and knowledge transfer; and Flipped Classroom provides an instructional strategy that reorganizes learning activities through technology-supported pre-class preparation and active in-class engagement. Their integration therefore connects philosophical, cognitive, and instructional dimensions within a unified learning framework.


Conclusion: The study proposes an integrative pedagogical framework in which Independent Learning serves as the philosophical foundation, Deep Learning as the cognitive objective, and Flipped Classroom as the instructional strategy. This synthesis is the study's principal contribution, moving beyond fragmented examinations of individual learning approaches toward a holistic framework designed to strengthen student autonomy, meaningful learning, higher-order thinking, and active engagement in 21st-century education. Future research should empirically validate the proposed framework across diverse educational levels and learning contexts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wiradinata, D. R., Jaja, J., & Hermawan, A. (2026). Comparative Literature Study on Independent Learning Methods, Deep Learning, and Flipped Classroom in 21st Century Education. Jurnal Edusci, 4(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.62885/edusci.v4i1.1342
Section
Articles

References

Adrianzén-Olano, I. (2026). Influence of the flipped classroom on autonomous learning at the university level: A systematic review. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 16(1), 315-332.

Agustini, K., Pratiwi, N. W. E., Mertayasa, I. N. E., Wahyuni, D. S., & Wedanthi, N. K. (2021, July). Flipped learning for 21st century competence development. In 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020) (pp. 534-540). Atlantis Press.

Baihaqi, M. A., Prayitno, H. J., Ishartono, N., Hamranani, S. S. T., Putra, C. A., & Nizaar, M. (2025). Reimagining 21st-century higher education: A literature-based exploration of deep learning for cognitive, social, and emotional skill development. Journal of Deep learning, 139-168.

Bishnoi, M. M. (2020). Flipped classroom and digitization: an inductive study on the learning framework for 21st century skill acquisition. JETT, 11(1), 30-45.

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Handel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. , 68, 1–24.

Çevikbaş, M. (2017). An innovative learning model in digital age: Flipped classroom. Journal of Education and Training Studies.

Chowdhury, M. (2021). Blended learning: How to flip the classroom for enhanced learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(1), 1–12.

Chikeme, P. C., Ogbonnaya, N. P., Ihudiebube-Splendor, C., Abonyi, E. O., Madu, O., & Okoronkwo, I. (2024). Self-directed learning readiness and learning achievements of a flipped classroom model approach in research methods class: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education in Practice, 77, 103968.

Dusengimana, C., Munyemana, J. J., & Mugabe, G. (2023). Trends in the use of Flipped Classroom Model and its Effectiveness in Higher Learning Education: A Systematic Review. African Educational Research Journal, 11(4), 616-633.Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin Press.

Khayat, M., Hafezi, F., Asgari, P., & Shoushtari, M. T. (2021). Comparison of the effectiveness of flipped classroom and traditional teaching method on the components of self-determination and class perception among University students. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 9(4), 230.

Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2021). Developing a flipped classroom model to improve students' learning performance. Computers & Education, 168, 104226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104226

Mariani, D., & Dewi, U. (2025). Literature Study: The Effect of The Problem-Based Learning Model Assisted by The Flipped Classroom on Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(1).

Maulana, I., Lengkong, I. K., Hafidhah, H., & Madhakomala, M. (2025). Improving Digital Literacy Skills With The Application Of Deep Learning Technology In Absorbing Information, Creating Information, And Evaluating And Creating Learning. Jurnal Edusci, 2(6), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.62885/edusci.v2i6.806

Nurdiyanti, D., Hermawan, A., & Supriatin, L. (2026). Analysis of Education SWOT in Indonesia in Preparing the Golden Generation of Indonesia 2045. Jurnal Edusci, 3(3), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.62885/edusci.v3i3.1143

Nurhajati, N., Pertiwi, S., & R. Madhakomala, R. M. (2025). Analysis of The Relationship Between TQM and MBS for Educational Needs in The 21 St Century. Jurnal Edusci, 2(3), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.62885/edusci.v2i3.575

Phinla, W., Phinla, W., Mahapoonyanont, N., & Songsang, N. (2025). Flipped learning in higher education: A theoretical and pedagogical review to support critical thinking and 21st century skill development.

Siregar, E., Nadiroh, N., & Mulyadi, D. (2021). Implementation of independent learning curriculum in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Education Research, 15(2), 123–135.

Skelcher, S. (2019). Cultural Conceptions of Flipped Learning: Examining Asian Perspectives in the 21st Century. Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 132-143.

Sopiah, S. (2024). Learning Islamic Education Online. Jurnal Edusci, 1(5), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.62885/edusci.v1i5.276

Syaifuddin, S., & Junaedi, J. (2025). Conceptual Analysis of It Media Integration In The Digital Islamic Education Curriculum As An Effort To Strengthen The Character Of Junior High School Students: A Library Perspective. Jurnal Edusci, 2(6), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.62885/edusci.v2i6.805

Widodo, H. P., Perfecto, M. R., Van Canh, L., & Buripakdi, A. (2022). Incorporating the Merdeka curriculum in educational practices: A global perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 675–690