LECTURER'S COMMUNICATION ATTRACTIVENESS AND STUDENT CREATIVITY IN THAI SUMMER COURSE PROGRAM
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to measure and analyze facts about the relationship between the lecturer's communication attractiveness in the Summer Course program in Thailand and student creativity in the study of culture tourism. The method used is quantitative; to measure the correlation, the researcher used the Correlation Analysis Test using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 software. The results of the research show that there is a significant correlation between the lecturer's communication attractiveness, who provides learning materials on the Summer Course program at the International College RMUTK, Thailand, and the creativity of Communication Science students in West Java, Indonesia, in studying Tourism and Thai culture. In general, the conclusion of this study has proven that the communication attractiveness of lecturers consists of six variables: lecturers' communication of attractiveness, namely: taking style attractiveness, communication skill attractiveness, communication techniques attractiveness, communication strategy attractiveness, communication behavior attractiveness, communication intelligence attractiveness has a positive and significant correlation with student creativity which is measured from 9 aspects creativity, namely: setting creativity, building creativity, organizing learning, facilitate creativity, positive creativity, balance and opportunity creativity, courage and imagination creativity, managing creativity, mastery of creativity. The variable with the highest relationship value is between the variable of Lecturer Communication Appeal and variable Y: Arrangement Creativity and Building Creativity. The relationship between variables that have the lowest relationship value is between the relationship of Communication Appeal and the variable of Learning Organization. The variable of Lecturer Communication Attractiveness (X) is closely related to Student Creativity (Y).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alamah, Z., AlSoussy, I., & Fakih, A. (2023). The Role of International Research Collaboration and Faculty Related Factors in Publication Citations: Evidence from Lebanon. Economies, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11030090
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design; Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Fitri, R., Lufri, L., Alberida, H., Amran, A., & Fachry, R. (2024). The project-based learning model and its contribution to student creativity: A review. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(1), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31499
Habib, S., Vogel, T., Anli, X., & Thorne, E. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? Journal of Creativity, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072
Hodges, T. E., & Baum, A. C. (2019). Quality Teaching : Handbook of Reseach on Feld–Based Teacher Education. IGI Global.
Indrawan, R., & Yaniawati, P. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Campuran untuk Manajemen, Pembangunan, dan Pendidikan. Refika Aditama.
Lubart, T., Kharkhurin, A. V., Corazza, G. E., Besançon, M., Yagolkovskiy, S. R., & Sak, U. (2022). Creative Potential in Science: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750224
Makmur, A., & Aspia, A. (2015). Efektifitas Penggunaan Metode Base Method dalam Meningkatkan Kreatifitas dan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 10 Padangsidempuan. EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 1(01).
Nilada, N., Payougkiattikun, W., & Thongsuk, T. (2024). The Study of Scientific Creativity using a Project-Based Learning Management Model. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 6(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.667
Sarnapi. (2023, August 11). 56 Mahasiswa dari Perguruan Tinggi Anggota Aspikom Jabar Ikuti Summer Course di Thailand. JS Jurnal Soreang.Com.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Business Approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Singarimbun. (2011). Metode Penelitian Survai. LP3S.
Sungkono, S., & Ekaputra, F. (2023). Effectiveness of project-based learning model on improving critical thinking skills and student creativity. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 3(5), 859–863. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.daengku2063
Wang, Y., Liu, W., Yu, X., Li, B., & Wang, Q. (2024). The impact of virtual technology on students’ creativity: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 215, 105044.
Winda Kustiawan, Tifani Liusnimun, Nurul Hidayat, & Jaman Wahidin. (2022). Komunikator Utama dalam Politik, Komunikator Politik dan Kepemimpinan Politik. J-KIs: Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 3(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.53429/j-kis.v3i1.421
Wolfe, M. T., & Patel, P. C. (2024). Image isn’t everything: Personality attractiveness, physical attractiveness, and self-employment earnings. Small Business Economics, 62(2), 807–831.
Wulandari, Y., S, R., & Ilham, D. (2024). Unleashing Student Creativity: A Dynamic Look at Merdeka BelajarCurriculum’s Impact. International Journal of Asian Education, 5(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v5i1.371
Zhong, S. (2024). The Effect of Classroom Teacher-Student Interaction Characteristics and STEM Teaching Models on Student Creativity. SHS Web of Conferences, 193, 02009. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419302009